Miller et al v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
| Christopher Miller and Carrie Miller |
| Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas |
| 4:2019cv03943 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Service in Removed Action by Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, filed.(Ingram, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Carrie Miller, Christopher Miller, filed.(Corona, Jesse) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/17/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(SarahShelbyadi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas, filed.(Ingram, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 129th District Court, Harris County, Texas, case number 2019-62504 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23350395) filed by Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Affidavit)(Ingram, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
