El-Haj et al v. Department of State et al
| Hoda Jalal El-Haj and Ahmad Mohamad Elhaj |
| US Department of Homeland Security, Michael R. Pompeo, Department of State, Elizabeth Richard, Embassy of the United States of America in Beirut, ACTING SECRETARY Kevin McAleenan, United States Citizenship And Immigration Service, and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli |
| 4:2019cv04058 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(LoriPurifoy, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Department of State, Embassy of the United States of America in Beirut, Kevin McAleenan, Michael R. Pompeo, Elizabeth Richard, US Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship And Immigration Service,, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 summons, #4 summons, #5 summons, #6 summons, #7 summons)(Elsharnoby, Mohamed) |
| Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23385313.) filed by Hoda Jalal El-Haj.(Elsharnoby, Mohamed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
