Livingston v. MetLife Insurance et al
Lameika Sharona Livingston |
Judge George Powell, David Ryan Michael & Associates, The State of Texas, Lin Marie Garsee & Associates, Judge Maria T. Jackson, MetLife Insurance, Harris County Sheriffs Office, Lin Marie Garsee, Brian Dasher, Walker County Texas, Walker City Jail, Country Bonding, ABM Industries Incorporated, David Michael Ryan, Judge Mark Kent Ellis, Marilynn Burgess, H-Town Bail Bond Company, Kim Ogg and Jason Ryana Horn |
4:2019cv04082 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Final JUDGMENT. Livingston's civil rights complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 11/1/2019. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 3 OPINION on Dismissal. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim for relief. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Lameika Sharona Livingston.(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.