Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.
| Manuel Mendoza |
| Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. |
| 4:2019cv04119 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Fred Haas Motors, Ltd., filed.(Boylan, Eric) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Giselle S. Guerra terminated.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney Kurt Lance Krolikowski in place of Giselle S. Guerra by Fred Haas Motors, Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Motion for Substitution and Withdrawal - Proposed Order)(Boylan, Eric) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Fred Haas Motors, Ltd., filed.(Guerra, Giselle) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. 12/19/2019.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Move in Response to Complaint by Fred Haas Motors, Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guerra, Giselle) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Manuel Mendoza, filed.(Gentile, Angelica) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. served on 10/29/2019, answer due 11/19/2019, filed.(Gentile, Angelica) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 3/2/2020 at 09:30 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Fred Haas Motors, Ltd.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Fred Haas Motors, Ltd., filed.(Gentile, Angelica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23407840) filed by Manuel Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gentile, Angelica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fred Haas Motors, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Kurt Lance Krolikowski |
| Represented By: | Eric Wade Boylan |
| Represented By: | Giselle S. Guerra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Manuel Mendoza | |
| Represented By: | Angelica Marie Gentile |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
