Kirby v. Lorie et al
| Brandon Lee Kirby |
| P. Michael Austin, A. Limbrick, Ruth E. Brouwer and David Lorie |
| 4:2019cv04294 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Lee Kirby, filed. (sguevara, 4) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Brandon Lee Kirby, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/31/2019. (sguevara, 4) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy) Parties notified.(bwhite, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Medical Records by Brandon Lee Kirby, filed. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted attachment)(FernandoVilla, 5) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Lee Kirby, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brandon Lee Kirby, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/21/2019. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Brandon Lee Kirby. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Private Attachments, #3 Envelope)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
