J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. SNP Hookah Lounge and Grill, Inc. et al
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. |
SNP Hookah Lounge and Grill, Inc., Nasir Mahmood, Muhammad Alam Millu and Mohd Azeem Nasir Mahmood |
4:2019cv04334 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Cable/Satellite TV |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/21/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8A before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mohd Azeem Nasir Mahmood, Nasir Mahmood, Muhammad Alam Millu, SNP Hookah Lounge and Grill, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request for Mohd Azeem Nasir Mahmood, #2 Summons Request for Muhammad Alam Millu, #3 Summons Request for Nasir Mahmood)(Diaz, David) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by J&J Sports Productions, Inc., filed.(Diaz, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23496341) filed by J&J Sports Productions, Inc..(Diaz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.