Cameron v. Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Mark Cameron
Defendant: Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC and Buckeye Partners, L.P.
Case Number: 4:2019cv04419
Filed: November 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Any answer or responsive pleading must be filed by January 7, 2020.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
December 23, 2019 Filing 8 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer by Buckeye Partners, L.P., Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lane, William)
December 5, 2019 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC served on 12/2/2019, answer due 12/23/2019, filed.(Burch, Richard)
December 5, 2019 Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Buckeye Partners, L.P. served on 11/21/2019, answer due 12/12/2019, filed.(Burch, Richard)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/12/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
November 12, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Mark Cameron, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew)
November 12, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Josephson on behalf of Mark Cameron, filed. (Josephson, Michael)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Mark Cameron, filed.(Burch, Richard)
November 12, 2019 Summons Issued as to Buckeye Partners, L.P., Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gclair, 4)
November 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buckeye Partners, L.P., Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23533669) filed by Mark Cameron.(Burch, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cameron v. Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinpoint Pipeline Inspection & Testing, LLC
Represented By: William P Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buckeye Partners, L.P.
Represented By: William P Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Cameron
Represented By: Richard J Burch
Represented By: Andrew Wells Dunlap
Represented By: Michael A Josephson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?