New Tech Global Ventures, LLC v. Bercier
| New Tech Global Ventures, LLC |
| Dale Bercier |
| 4:2019cv04423 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Kyle D. Winnick to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Galvin B. Kennedy on behalf of Dale Bercier, filed. (Kennedy, Galvin) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Peter N. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Peter N. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice by New Tech Global Ventures, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/30/2019. (Idalski, Annette) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Kyle D. Winnick to Appear Pro Hac Vice by New Tech Global Ventures, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/30/2019. (Idalski, Annette) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re: Confirm Arbitration Award by New Tech Global Ventures, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Idalski, Annette) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Dale Bercier served on 11/21/2019, answer due 1/21/2020, filed.(Idalski, Annette) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Carl A. Fitz on behalf of Dale Bercier, filed. (Fitz, Carl) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 2/28/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Dale Bercier. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Dale Bercier, filed.(Idalski, Annette) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dale Bercier (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23535389) filed by New Tech Global Ventures, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bercier Complaint, #2 Exhibit Stipulation of Dismissal, #3 Exhibit Final Award, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Idalski, Annette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: New Tech Global Ventures, LLC v. Bercier | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dale Bercier | |
| Represented By: | Carl Andrew Fitz |
| Represented By: | Galvin B Kennedy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: New Tech Global Ventures, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Annette A Idalski |
| Represented By: | Kyle D. Winnick |
| Represented By: | Peter N. Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
