i2 Enabled Inc. et al v. United States of America et al
| Zeinab Zamani and i2 Enabled Inc. |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Attorney General William Barr, Laura Zuchowski, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Laura B. Zuchowski |
| 4:2019cv04426 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Stay the Case by William Barr, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Laura B. Zuchowski, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(Wiley, Ariel) |
| Filing 2 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed.(Green, Sheridan) |
| Summons Issued as to William Barr, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Laura Zuchowski. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gclair, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23535974) filed by i2 Enabled Inc., Zeinab Zamani.(Green, Sheridan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
