Chappie v. Energi Pros LLC
| RAYMOND CHAPPIE |
| ENERGI PROS LLC |
| 4:2019cv04456 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Peter Bray |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 General Reference to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Nicholas R. Conlon to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Lotus Cannon to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Jason T. Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Lynn N Hughes. Judge Gray H Miller no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (rguerrero, 4) |
|
Filing 9
RECUSAL ORDER. Judge Gray H Miller recused. Deadlines in scheduling orders subsist. Court settings are vacated.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Nicholas R. Conlon, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond Chappie, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/27/2020. (Branham, Charles) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Lotus Cannon, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond Chappie, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/27/2020. (Branham, Charles) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Jason T. Brown, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond Chappie, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/27/2020. (Branham, Charles) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Raymond Chappie, filed.(Branham, Charles) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 2/28/2020 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(RuthGuerreroadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ENERGI PROS LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(rguerrero, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to ENERGI PROS LLC, filed.(Branham, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ENERGI PROS LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23553872) filed by RAYMOND CHAPPIE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - RC Consent)(Branham, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chappie v. Energi Pros LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ENERGI PROS LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RAYMOND CHAPPIE | |
| Represented By: | Charles William Branham, III |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Raymond Conlon |
| Represented By: | Lotus Cannon |
| Represented By: | Jason T Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
