Boyd v. Saul
Courtney Boyd |
Andrew Saul, US Attorney General and US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Texas |
4:2019cv04525 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Texas served on 12/31/2019, answer due 3/2/2020, filed.(Donaldson, Madison) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to US Attorney General served on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020, filed.(Donaldson, Madison) |
Filing 4 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Andrew Saul served on 11/27/2019, answer due 1/27/2020, filed.(Donaldson, Madison) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon, #3 Summon, #4 Summon, #5 Summon)(hlerma, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, Attorney General of the United States, US Attorney's Office, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Summons, #5 Exhibit Summons)(Vessel, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23587317) filed by Courtney Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vessel, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.