Paredes et al v. The Alliance For Multicultural Community Services d/b/a The Alliance
| Karley Paredes and Carla Paredes |
| The Alliance For Multicultural Community Services d/b/a The Alliance and The Alliance for Multicultural Community Services |
| 4:2019cv04623 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Alliance for Multicultural Community Services. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(rguerrero, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to The Alliance for Multicultural Community Services, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Davis-Smith, Shelly) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/13/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(LoriPurifoyadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Alliance For Multicultural Community Services d/b/a The Alliance (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23644546) filed by Karley Paredes, Carla Paredes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis-Smith, Shelly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
