Wade v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Carla Wade |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, United Consumer Financial Services and United Consumer Financial Services Company |
4:2019cv04632 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Carla Wade, filed.(Hammond, Charles) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, United Consumer Financial Services Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summon)(hlerma, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/21/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(MelissaMorganadi, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, United Consumer Financial Services, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hammond, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, United Consumer Financial Services (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23647619) filed by Carla Wade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hammond, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.