Shaw v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Roderick Shaw |
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
4:2019cv04862 |
December 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Charles Eskridge. STATUS CONFERENCE held on 02/06/2020. The Court addressed concerns related to five cases currently pending in the Southern District of Texas suggested as related to this action. The Court heard background on the case and anticipated legal and discovery issues. The Court will issue the submitted docket control order with any modifications deemed appropriate. Appearances: Robert Chamless Lane, Scott Alexander Lick f/ Plaintiff; Anthony LaPorte, Zack Smith f/ Defendant (ERO:used), filed.(jengonzalez, 4) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation filed by Roderick Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DOT, #2 Exhibit Confirmation, #3 Exhibit NTC Information, #4 Exhibit NTC Response, #5 Exhibit HUD Statement, #6 Judge's Procedures Judge's Order for Conference, #7 Judge's Procedures Court Procedures, #8 Exhibit Plaintiffs Certificate of Intrested Parties)(Lane, Robert) |
Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Roderick Shaw, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order SCHEDULING AND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER)(Lane, Robert) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua D. Gordon on behalf of Roderick Shaw, filed. (Lane, Robert) |
Filing 10 ORDER Striking Document re: #9 Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan. Parties are ordered to refile their Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan by 02/03/2020.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4) |
Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Roderick Shaw, filed.(Lane, Robert) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Roderick Shaw by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed.(Laporte, Anthony) |
Filing 7 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Roderick Shaw, filed.(Lane, Robert) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Roderick Shaw, filed.(Lane, Robert) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. It is ordered that the deadline for JP Morgan Chase Bank to answer is extended to 01/17/2020.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Deadline to Answer/Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Laporte, Anthony) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/6/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8A before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed.(Laporte, Anthony) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 164th, case number 201982945 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23763071) filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit List of Counsel of Record, #3 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Orig Pet, RFD and Written Discovery, #5 Exhibit Request for Issuance of Service, #6 Exhibit Return of Service, #7 Exhibit Harris County Property Appraisal Report)(Laporte, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.