Manley
Stephen Manley |
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation and Department Of Education |
4:2020cv00044 |
January 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis and denying the appeal, the case is dismissed with prejudice.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE to Appellant's motion for leave to file appeal, filed by Department Of Education. (Cowan, Chad) |
Filing 2 RESPONSE to #1 Clerk's Notice of Filing of an Appeal from the Bankruptcy Court, , filed by Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Ray, Doug) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Stephen Manley, filed. Originally docketed in bankruptcy case 19-3577. Motion Docket Date 1/29/2020. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 1 Clerks Notice of Filing of an Appeal from an Order of the Bankruptcy Court. On 1/3/2020, Stephen Manley filed a notice of appeal. The appeal has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison, Civil Action 4:20-cv-44. Parties notified, filed. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal)(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.