Dos Santos v. Air China Limited
| Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos |
| Air China Limited |
| 4:2020cv00085 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Consolidate Lead Case No. 4:19-cv-01226 and Member Case No. 4:20-cv-00085 by Air China Limited, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Adams, Kent) |
Filing 19
ORDER denying #6 Motion to Remand.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/6/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(mmapps, 4)
|
| Filing 17 Case transferred in from Texas Western. Case Number 1:19-cv-00383; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
|
Filing 16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #13 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the above-styled cause of action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dm)
|
| Motions No Longer Referred: #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court, #3 MOTION to Transfer Case and Consolidate Related Cases (dm) |
| Filing 15 MOTION Certification of Lack of Objections to, and Request for Confirmation of, Magistrate Report and Recommendations Recommending Granting of Motion to Transfer Venue and Consolidate Related Cases by Air China Limited. (Adams, Kent) |
| Filing 14 Copy of #13 Report and Recommendations sent via certified mail and first class mail, as to Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. (lt) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Motion to Transfer Case filed by Air China Limited, and #6 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. Signed by Judge Susan Hightower. (lt) |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Parties by Air China Limited. (Adams, Kent) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER WITHDRAWING #7 Order Referring Motion, ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #3 MOTION to Transfer Case and Consolidate Related Cases filed by Air China Limited, #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Susan Hightower. (dm)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Air China Limited (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Kent) |
| Filing 9 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Air China Limited. (Adams, Kent) |
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Air China Limited, re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Adams, Kent) |
|
Filing 7
***WITHDRAWN PER ORDER #11*** ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #3 MOTION to Transfer Case and Consolidate Related Cases filed by Air China Limited, #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Mark Lane. (afd) Modified on 7/19/2019 (dm).
|
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. (afd) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance with Order Requiring Filing of State Court Case File by Air China Limited (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Kent) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dl)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos. (dl) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Transfer Case and Consolidate Related Cases by Air China Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Adams, Kent) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet by Air China Limited. (Adams, Kent) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Air China Limited (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11964005), filed by Air China Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Adams, Kent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dos Santos v. Air China Limited | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rogerio Ribiero Dos Santos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Air China Limited | |
| Represented By: | Kent M Adams |
| Represented By: | Brian George Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
