Gamboa v. Davis et al
Jesse Celedon Gamboa |
Lorie Davis and Debra Gibbs |
4:2020cv00231 |
January 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Kenneth M Hoyt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from Jesse Celedon Gamboa re: Compliance and Proof of Service, filed. (ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response, by Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Christian-Carnal, Sallie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sallie Christian-Carnal on behalf of Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, filed. (Christian-Carnal, Sallie) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Lorie Davis, Debra Gibbs. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail and NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER to ISSUE SUMMONS (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. Sent a copy to TDCJ- Office of General Counsel.(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (olindor, 4) |
Civil Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU093623, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner's Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jesse Celedon Gamboa.(olindor, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.