DiLuzio et al v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan et al
| Daniel DiLuzio, Kyle Everett, Sandra Barton, David Korell, Mark Quakenbush, Everly Saudale and Lindsay Counseller |
| Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan Committee, Newfield Exploration Company and Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan |
| 4:2020cv00490 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to All Defendants, filed.(Minces, David) |
Filing 2
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 5/11/2020 at 10:30 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes(Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan, Newfield Exploration Company, Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan Committee (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24176263) filed by Mark Quakenbush, Everly Saudale, Sandra Barton, David Korell, Daniel DiLuzio, Kyle Everett, Lindsay Counseller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Minces, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
