Brooks v. Bob Casey Courthouse et al
| Gregory Wade Brooks, II |
| Bob Casey Courthouse, Harris County Jail, Assistant District Attorney, District Courthouse and District Attorney |
| 4:2020cv00808 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on March 25, 2020(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice as barred by the three-strikes rule. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Inmate Balance History by Gregory Wade Brooks, II, filed.(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gregory Wade Brooks, II, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/25/2020. (dnoriega, 1) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Gregory Wade Brooks, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(dnoriega, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
