Brooks v. Abbott et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Defendant: Channel (13) News Station, Fox 26 News, Greg Abbott and Channel (11) News Station
Case Number: 4:2020cv01016
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Vanessa D Gilmore
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Gregory Wade Brooks, II re: #5 Order of Dismissal,, filed. (hlerma, 4)
April 20, 2020 Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Gregory Wade Brooks, II re: #4 Memorandum on Dismissal,, filed. (BeverlyWright, 4)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after payment of the entire $400.00 filing fee. The Court must receive the payment within thirty days of this order. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
March 31, 2020 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The complaint filed by Gregory Wade Brooks, II is DISMISSED. All pending motions are DENIED. Brooks is warned that continued frivolous filings may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
March 20, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShoshanaArnow, 4)
March 19, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gregory Wade Brooks, II, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/9/2020. (ShoshanaArnow, 4)
March 19, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Gregory Wade Brooks, II.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Abbott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Channel (13) News Station
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fox 26 News
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Channel (11) News Station
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?