Shropshire v. Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.
| Floyd Shropshire |
| Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01189 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Strike by Floyd Shropshire, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/17/2020. (Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration by Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order)(Quezada, Stephen) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's deadline to move to strike Defendant's affirmative defenses is extended to May 27, 2020.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Deadline to Move to Strike Affirmative Defenses by Floyd Shropshire, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc., filed.(Quezada, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Floyd Shropshire, filed.(Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. served on 4/8/2020, answer due 4/29/2020, filed.(Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Carl A. Fitz on behalf of Floyd Shropshire, filed. (Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Floyd Shropshire, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(DawnWaggoner, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/8/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(olindoradi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc., filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24507798) filed by Floyd Shropshire. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Josephson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shropshire v. Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Floyd Shropshire | |
| Represented By: | Michael A Josephson |
| Represented By: | Andrew Wells Dunlap |
| Represented By: | Carl Andrew Fitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Jose Quezada |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
