HMT, LLC v. Giles Construction, Ltd.
| HMT, LLC |
| Giles Construction, Ltd. |
| 4:2020cv01216 |
| April 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nancy F Atlas |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed.(Douglas, Julie) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #11 Answer to State Court Petition/Notice of Removal,, Counterclaim, with Jury Demand by HMT, LLC, filed.(Nye, James) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: Pretrial conference held Appearances: Julie A Douglas, James Hunter Nye. Ct Reporter: K.Metzger. Amended Pleadings due by 7/10/2020. Deft Expert Witness List due by 1/15/2021. Rebuttal Opinions due 2/5/2021. Discovery due by 3/31/2021. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 4/21/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 7/10/2020 Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/7/2021. Mediation due by 1/29/2021. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 4/21/2021. Pltf Expert Report due by 12/1/2020. Docket Call set for 7/21/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Nancy F Atlas(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by HMT, LLC, filed.(Nye, James) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against HMT, LLC by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Subcontractor Contract, #2 Exhibit B-Change Orders, #3 Exhibit C-1/9/19 Invoice, #4 Exhibit D-1/16/19 Invoice)(Douglas, Julie) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by HMT, LLC, filed.(Nye, James) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed.(Sibley, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Erik G. Chappell to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER approving #6 Stipulation to extend defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's petition; Answer due for Giles Construction, Ltd. by 5/4/2020.(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re: Answer Date by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed.(Sibley, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Erik G. Chappell to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 5/1/2020. (Sibley, Joseph) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Julie A. Douglas to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for JULIE A. DOUGLAS to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Giles Construction, Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 4/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CERT OF GOOD STANDING)(Sibley, Joseph) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/12/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Nancy F Atlas. (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(JenniferOlsonadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 248th District Court, Montgomery County, case number 19-10-13972 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24517043) filed by Giles Construction, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Petition, #3 Exhibit Request and Return of Service, #4 Exhibit Show Cause Order, #5 Exhibit Reset Show Cause Hearing)(Sibley, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
