Group 1 Automotive, Inc., et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
| 4:2020cv01290 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS RE: The objections by Plaintiff Group 1 Automotive Inc to the Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are SUSTAINED. Dkt 77. The motion by Plaintiff Group 1 Automotive Inc fo r leave to amend is GRANTED. Dkt 51. The motion by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company to strike or dismiss is DENIED. Dkt 55. The parties are ORDERED to file within fourteen days a proposed amended scheduling order, noting any disagreements. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIED 7 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Group 1 Automotive, Inc., et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
