Maldonado et al v. FirstService Residential, Inc. et al
| 4:2020cv01484 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
244
FINAL JUDGMENT entered: All other relief not expressly provided is denied. This final judgment disposes of all claims as to all parties. Case terminated on 11/8/21.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
233
AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION entered. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. The defendants' motion is granted as to Friendswood's motion to dismiss, and denied as to the remaining developer-defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Docket Entry No. 172). The plaintiffs' motio n to deem Friendswood Development Company a party-defendant to trial on the merits of permanent injunction and declaratory relief, (Docket Entry No. 163), is denied. The Maldonados' motion for summary judgment on the counterclaims against them, (Docket Entry No.181), is denied. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: The motion to dismiss filed by the Maldonados as to the counterclaim brought by John H. Palamidy, (Docket Entry No. 128), is denied. The motion to dismiss filed by the Maldonados as to the counterclaims brought by Cynt hia Hill, (Docket Entry No. 136), is granted as to the stalking, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference, and injunctive relief claims, and is denied as to the breach of contract claim based on the Maldonados parking their trailer in the subdivision and parking their vehicles on the street overnight. Cynthia A. Hill's motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim, (Docket Entry No. 175), is granted.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER entered: The motion to dismiss filed by FirstService, Royal Brook, Brown, and McKenry, (Docket Entry No. 33), is denied as to the §§ 1981, 1982, and 1985(3) claims, and the motion to dismiss is granted as to t he intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.Palamidy's motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 36), is denied as to the §§ 1981, 1982, and 1985(3) claims, the tortious interference claim, and the stalking claim, and is granted a s to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.Hill's motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 35), is granted.Herold's motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 31), is granted.The Maldonados motion to dismiss the counterclaim is denie d as to alleged violations of§10.02. The motion is granted as to alleged violations of §10.20: Royal Brook did not sufficiently plead a claim based on the Maldonados allegedly parking their van in their driveway; but Royal Brook did sufficiently plead a violation of §10.20 based on the Maldonados parking their trailer in the subdivision and parking their van on the street overnight (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: GRANTING 69 Opposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maldonado et al v. FirstService Residential, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
