Pearson v. Warden Townsend et al
| James E. Pearson |
| Jane Doe, John Doe, Medical Director for Jester 3, Warden Townsend, Alfred Washington and Ms. Baker |
| 4:2020cv02039 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to James E. Pearson re: #4 Order of Dismissal, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to James E. Pearson re: #3 Notice of Deficient Pleading (FORM), filed. (UTF; Discharged)(sguevara, 4) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to James E. Pearson re: #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. (UTF; Discharged)(sguevara, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 7/21/20 (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to James E. Pearson. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 7/13/2020, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by James E. Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
