Cox v. GC Services, LP
Latrina Cox |
GC Services, LP |
4:2020cv02202 |
June 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #12 Notice of Dismissal. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Parties by Latrina Cox, filed. (Thompson, Russell) |
Filing 11 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #10 Notice of Settlement. Case terminated on 9/3/2020. Deadline to reinstate: within 60 days from the date of this order. Deadline to reinstate: November 2, 2020. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Latrina Cox, filed. (Thompson, Russell) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/14/2020 at 09:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan due by 10/7/2020. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint ; Answer due for GC Services, LP by 8/28/2020. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by GC Services, LP, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Meier, Margaret) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to GC Services, LP served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020, filed.(Thompson, Russell) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/14/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ShadiaNashadi, 4) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to GC Services, LP. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Latrina Cox, filed.(Thompson, Russell) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to GC Services, LP, filed.(Thompson, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GC Services, LP (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24835811) filed by Latrina Cox. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thompson, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. GC Services, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GC Services, LP | |
Represented By: | Margaret Jo Meier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Latrina Cox | |
Represented By: | Russell S Thompson, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.