Parker v. St. Lukes Community Development Corporation - Sugar Land
Plaintiff: Keneisha Parker
Defendant: ST. LUKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - SUGAR LAND
Case Number: 4:2020cv02205
Filed: June 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ST. LUKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - SUGAR LAND (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24836257) filed by Keneisha Parker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cowan, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. St. Lukes Community Development Corporation - Sugar Land
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ST. LUKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - SUGAR LAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keneisha Parker
Represented By: Robert W Cowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?