Garrido Rojas v. Barr et al
| Leydis Garrido Rojas |
| Chad Wolf, ICE ERO Field Office Daniel A Bible, Exec. Assoc. Dir. Matthew T Albence, Warden Joe M. Smith and U.S AG William Pelham Barr |
| 4:2020cv02217 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Vanessa D Gilmore |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #4 Notice of Dismissal. Case terminated on 7/27/2020. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Matthew T Albence, William Pelham Barr, Daniel A Bible, Joe M. Smith, Chad Wolf by Leydis Garrido Rojas, filed. (Maxfield-Gracia, Amber) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Matthew T Albence, William Pelham Barr, Daniel A Bible, Joe M. Smith, Chad Wolf. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JosephWells, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Matthew T Albence, William Pelham Barr, Daniel A Bible, Joe M. Smith, Chad Wolf, filed.(Maxfield-Gracia, Amber) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0541-24840867) filed by Leydis Garrido Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits in Support of Habeas Petition)(Maxfield-Gracia, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
