Davis v. Gonzalez et al
Bryant Davis |
Laxman Sunder, Darryl Coleman and ED GONZALEZ |
4:2020cv02229 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Andrew S Hanen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Darryl Coleman, Ed Gonzalez, Laxman Sunder, filed.(Hedge, Laura) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Darryl Coleman, Ed Gonzalez, Laxman Sunder, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Hedge, Laura) |
Filing 4 Proof of Service by Darryl Coleman, filed.(Hedge, Laura) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DawnWaggoneradi, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/10/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(DawnWaggoneradi, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 333rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, case number 2020-30248 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24843488) filed by Darryl Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Continuation List of Counsel, #3 Continuation State Notice of Filing of Removal, #4 Appendix Index of Matters Filed Upon Removal, #5 Exhibit Certified Copies of State Court Filings)(Hedge, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.