Dang et al v. Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Springwoods Neurology, PA and Linh T. Dang
Defendant: Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2020cv02326
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Catherine D. Cockerham to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2020. (Kirchner, Christine)
July 22, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Zachary Brian Schreiber to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2020. (Kirchner, Christine)
July 22, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Sarah D. Gordon to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2020. (Kirchner, Christine)
July 22, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Catherine D. Cockerham to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2020. (Kirchner, Christine)( Per Attorney filed in error) Modified on 7/22/2020 (mmapps, 4).
July 8, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed.(Kirchner, Christine)
July 8, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company, filed.(Kirchner, Christine)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/9/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(JosephWellsadi, 4)
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 269th District Court, case number 2020-32809 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24870925) filed by Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Kirchner, Christine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dang et al v. Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company
Represented By: Likun Chen
Represented By: Christine Kirchner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Springwoods Neurology, PA
Represented By: Nabil Majed Nachawati, II
Represented By: Nejat Abubeker Ahmed
Represented By: Jennifer Beth LeMaster
Represented By: Matthew R. McCarley
Represented By: S Ann Saucer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linh T. Dang
Represented By: Nabil Majed Nachawati, II
Represented By: Nejat Abubeker Ahmed
Represented By: Jennifer Beth LeMaster
Represented By: Matthew R. McCarley
Represented By: S Ann Saucer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?