Brooks II v. Bob Casey District Court House et al
| Gregory W Brooks II and Gregory W Brooks, II |
| Bob Casey District Court House, Harris County Jail and Kim Ogg |
| 4:2020cv02512 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Gregory W Brooks II, filed. (sguevara, 4) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Because Brooks has accumulated three strikes, he is barred under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis absent a showing that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Brooks complaint claims document tampering and obstruction of justice, but does not allege that he is in imminent physical danger. Brooks #1 complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)...***. Case terminated on 7/23/20....*** Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BeverlyWright, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Bob Casey District Court House, Harris County Jail, Kim Ogg (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Gregory W Brooks II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(BeverlyWright, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
