Kinaka v. Attorney General Of The United States et al
| Josephine Lawong Kinaka |
| Attorney General Of The United States, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Randy Tate |
| 4:2020cv02630 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Attorney General Of The United States, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
Filing 5
ORDER on Extension granting #4 . Internal review set for 9/7/2020. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time File Answer by Attorney General Of The United States, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on Records. By 8/5/2020, the government must file all of its records showing why Kinaka was arrested and detained. Internal review set for 8/10/2020. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jdav, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Josephine Lawong Kinaka.(jdav, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
