Alexander v. Moore et al
Petitioner: Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Respondent: Sharanda D. Mathis, Rocky Moore, Ashley Hastings and Alvernon DeLeon
Case Number: 4:2020cv02724
Filed: August 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Vanessa D Gilmore
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 9/18/2020. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4)
September 18, 2020 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Alexanders civil rights claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to re-filing in a separate civil action governed by 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Alexanders constructive motion to proceed in forma pauperis, #1 , is DENIED. All remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4)
September 4, 2020 Filing 7 EXHIBITS/Step 2 Grievance dated 8/27/20 by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr (sanderson, 4)
September 1, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr, filed. (jtabares, 1)
August 24, 2020 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Law by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr, filed.(JosephWells, 4)
August 24, 2020 Filing 4 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr, filed.(gkelner, 4)
August 4, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dnoriega, 1)
August 4, 2020 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law and Facts in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr, filed.(dnoriega, 1)
August 4, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dnoriega, 1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Moore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sharanda D. Mathis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rocky Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ashley Hastings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alvernon DeLeon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?