Daya v. Sky MRI & Diagnostics, LLC et al
| David R. Daya |
| Badshah Management, LLC, Akbar Ali and Sky MRI & Diagnostics, LLC |
| 4:2020cv02965 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to allow alternate service of process upon the Defendants by David R. Daya, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - A, #2 Exhibit - B, #3 Exhibit - C, #4 Proposed Order)(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David R. Daya, filed.(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Akbar Ali, Badshah Management, LLC, Sky MRI & Diagnostics, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation)(Ahmed, Salar) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/13/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25107359) filed by David R. Daya.(Ahmed, Salar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
