Daya v. Breeze MRI, LLC et al
| David R. Daya |
| Breeze MRI, LLC, Dilip Patel and Ravi Patel |
| 4:2020cv03005 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Hughes on behalf of Breeze MRI, LLC, Ravi Patel, filed. (Hughes, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Breeze MRI, LLC, Ravi Patel, filed.(Lang, Shannon) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Breeze MRI, LLC, Ravi Patel, filed.(Lang, Shannon) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ShadiaNash, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/5/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ChristopherSarratadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation)(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David R. Daya, filed.(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25122062) filed by David R. Daya.(Ahmed, Salar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
