Bosworth v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
| William Bosworth |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation |
| 4:2020cv03359 |
| September 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
ORDER OF DISMISSAL #30 Unopposed MOTION for Nonsuit . Case terminated on September 17, 2021 (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 30 Unopposed MOTION for Nonsuit by William Bosworth, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanford, Joshua) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER granting #28 Motion for Extension of Time. Discovery deadline is reset to 9/27/21; Motion cut-off is reset to 10/28/21.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 28 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to complete Discovery and of the Motion Cut-Off date by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Roberts, MaryJo) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER granting #26 Motion for Entry of Order.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 26 MOTION for Entry of Order re: Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Roberts, MaryJo) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER granting #24 Motion for Extension of Time. Discovery deadline is reset to August 26, 2021; Motion cut-off date is reset to September 28, 2021; Joint Pretrial Order is due January 27, 2022 and the Trial term is March/April, 2022. ETT: 3 day bench trial.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 24 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Deadlines by 90 days by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Roberts, MaryJo) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #21 Motion to Withdraw; withdrawing #15 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc.. Plaintiff's original complaint (Doc. # 1) is reinstituted as the operative complaint and Defendant's Answer (Doc. # 10) is reinstituted as the operative answer.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 22 ANSWER to #15 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed.(Lombardi, Robert) |
| Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw #15 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by William Bosworth, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanford, Joshua) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall have until 12/29/20 to file a pleading in response to the First Amended and Substituted Complaint-Collective Action.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings to First Amended and Substituted Complaint Collective Action by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Roberts, MaryJo) |
|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER. Trial Term: November/December 2021. ETT: 3 days. Bench trial. Amended Pleadings due by 12/31/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 12/31/2020 Pltf Expert Witness List due by 1/29/2021. Deft Expert Witness List due by 2/26/2021. Discovery due by 5/28/2021. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 6/30/2021. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 6/30/2021. Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/29/2021.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
| Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 12/1/2020. Scheduling order issued. Appearances: Joshua Jon Sanford, MaryJo L Roberts.(ERO:Yes), filed.(jmarchand, 4) |
| Filing 16 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by William Bosworth, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Schlumberger Technology Corporation filed by William Bosworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join)(Sanford, Joshua) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Robert P. Lombardi to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear on behalf of Maryjo L. Roberts.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Robert P. Lombardi to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lombardi, Robert) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for MaryJo L. Roberts to Appear as Attorney by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zurik, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed.(Zurik, Samuel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall have until November 9, 2020 to file a pleading in response to the Complaint.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed.(Roberts, MaryJo) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zurik, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Schlumberger Technology Corporation served on 10/5/2020, answer due 10/26/2020, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by William Bosworth, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Schlumberger Technology Corporation. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(DawnWaggoner, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/1/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ShadiaNashadi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25276989) filed by William Bosworth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bosworth v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Bosworth | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Jon Sanford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert P Lombardi |
| Represented By: | Samuel Zurik, III |
| Represented By: | MaryJo L Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
