Mamon v. Erives et al
| Jamar Mamon |
| James Wyman, Carlos Beal, HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Elizabeth Erives |
| 4:2020cv03471 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jamar Mamon. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Jamar Mamon.(BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Probable Cause Order, #2 Proposed Order)(Cohen, Marjorie) |
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 1/29/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Judge's Procedures) Parties notified.(BrendaLacy, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jamar Mamon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Civil Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number 098021, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(BrendaLacy, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
