Siena Lending Group LLC v. Imperial Zinc Corporation
| Siena Lending Group LLC |
| Imperial Zinc Corporation |
| 4:2020cv03598 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL on #10 Notice of Dismissal without Prejudice. Case terminated on 11/20/2020. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Defendants by Siena Lending Group LLC, filed. (Given, Bernard) |
| Filing 9 STATEMENT Regarding Diversity of Citizenship by Imperial Zinc Corporation, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Matthews, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Imperial Zinc Corporation, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Matthews, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Courtroom Procedures and Order for Conference and Disclosure of Interested Parties by Imperial Zinc Corporation, filed. (Matthews, Melissa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/8/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Steven N. Malitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Michelle G. Novick to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Steven N. Malitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Imperial Zinc Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2020. (Matthews, Melissa) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Michelle G. Novick to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Imperial Zinc Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2020. (Matthews, Melissa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 270th District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2020-65929 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25388016) filed by Imperial Zinc Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Index of State Court Documents, #3 Exhibit A-1 - Harris County Court Docket, #4 Exhibit A-2 - Plaintiff's Petition, #5 Counsel and Party List)(Matthews, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Siena Lending Group LLC v. Imperial Zinc Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Siena Lending Group LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bernard R Given, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Imperial Zinc Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Dorman Matthews |
| Represented By: | Michelle G Novick |
| Represented By: | Steven N Malitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
