Hebrew v. Gonzalez et al
| Elimelech Shmi Hebrew |
| Mariel Rosario, Thomas Pasket, Ed Gonzalez and Harris County Sheriff's Office |
| 4:2020cv03679 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Setting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 2/18/2021 at 09:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison, filed. (wbostic, 4)
|
|
Filing 15
Amended MOTION to Dismiss #10 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and (e), Fed. R. Civ. P., and Alternatively For a More Definite Statement by Ed Gonzalez, Harris County Sheriff's Office, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Callistien, Barbara)
|
|
Filing 14
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George C Hanks, Jr. PRE-MOTION CONFERENCE held on 12/8/2020 re: #9 REQUEST for pre-motion conference ( Motion to Dismiss due by 12/11/2020., Responses due by 1/4/2021., Replies due by 1/11/2021, ). Appearances:Mary Baker for Barbara Callistien. Plaintiff not present. (Court Reporter: N. Forrest)(Tape #10:12-10:16), filed.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Setting re: #9 REQUEST for pre-motion conference. Parties notified. Pre-Motion Conference set for 12/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in by video before Judge George C Hanks Jr, filed. (gclairadi, 4)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to #7 Order on Motion to Dismiss, filed by Elimelech Shmi Hebrew. (rcastro, 4)
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY to Notice of Case Filing #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed by Elimelech Shmi Hebrew. (rcastro, 4)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ed Gonzalez, Thomas Pasket, Mariel Rosario, Harris County Sheriff's Office filed by Elimelech Shmi Hebrew.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 9
REQUEST for pre-motion conference, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email communication)(Callistien, Barbara)
|
|
Filing 8
Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Elimelech Shmi Hebrew re: #3 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols, filed. The address was updated and the Order was re-noticed. (ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER striking #6 Motion to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and (e), Fed. R. Civ. P., and Alternatively For a More Definite Statement by Ed Gonzalez, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Callistien, Barbara)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Elimelech Shmi Hebrew re: #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. [Address corrected, renoticed] (DawnWaggoner, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gkelner, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (olindor, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Elimelech Shmi Hebrew. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Exhibit) (olindor, 4).
|
|
Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU098433, filed. (olindor, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
