Mitchell v. Texas Farm Bureau
Joe Mitchell |
Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Texas |
4:2020cv03716 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for All Defendants 1/14/21.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry Moscowitz on behalf of Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, filed. (Moscowitz, Barry) |
Filing 11 ADVISORY by Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, filed.(Fozouni, Farsheed) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time NSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING to PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING TOPLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Moscowitz, Barry) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition to #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Joe Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Golub, Andrew) |
Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Joe Mitchell.(Golub, Andrew) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Texas Farm Bureau, filed.(Fozouni, Farsheed) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Farsheed Fozouni on behalf of Texas Farm Bureau, filed. (Fozouni, Farsheed) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Texas Farm Bureau, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Moscowitz, Barry) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Joe Mitchell, filed.(Throckmorton, Connor) |
Filing 2 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 2/26/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Texas Farm Bureau (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25434084) filed by Joe Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Golub, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.