Davis vs. Darden Restaurants
Plaintiff: Amanda M Davis
Defendant: Olive Garden (Darden) and Darden Restaurants doing business as Olive Garden
Case Number: 4:2020cv03728
Filed: October 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Vanessa D Gilmore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2020 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Darden Restaurats, filed.(Wilson, Lee)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Substitute Michael Wilson as Attorney. Attorney Conor Henry Kelly is withdrawn. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
November 10, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Substitute Attorney Michael Wilson in place of Conor H. Kelly by Darden Restaurats, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Conor)
November 6, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Darden Restaurats, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Kelly, Conor)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/19/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Vanessa D Gilmore. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/5/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Vanessa D Gilmore. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(hlermaadi, 4)
October 30, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2020-61967 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25439880) filed by Darden Restaurants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Index of Matter being Filed, #3 Exhibit B - State Ct Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Record, #5 Exhibit D - Declaration, #6 Exhibit E - List of Counsel, #7 Exhibit F - Notice to State Court of Removal)(Kelly, Conor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis vs. Darden Restaurants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Olive Garden (Darden)
Represented By: Conor Henry Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darden Restaurants doing business as Olive Garden
Represented By: Conor Henry Kelly
Represented By: Michael Wilson
Represented By: Lee Michael Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda M Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?