Moreno, Jr. v. Sesco Cement, Corp
| Hector Moreno, Jr. |
| Sesco Cement, Corp |
| 4:2020cv03831 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Extend Deadline to File Answer by Sesco Cement, Corp, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Patton, Daniel) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Sesco Cement, Corp 1/6/2021.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Join a Collective/Class Action for Jose Armenta and Sergio Perez by Hector Moreno, Jr., filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Deadline to File Answer Or Other Responsive Pleading by Sesco Cement, Corp, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Patton, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Join a Collective/Class Action for Ricardo Duenez, Carlos Jasso, Samuel Mendieta and Christopher Perez by Hector Moreno, Jr., filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 2/26/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RubenCastroadi, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sesco Cement, Corp. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William R. Liles on behalf of Hector Moreno, Jr., filed. (Liles, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Hector Moreno, Jr., filed. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Sesco Cement, Corp, filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sesco Cement, Corp (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25493950) filed by Hector Moreno, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Josephson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moreno, Jr. v. Sesco Cement, Corp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Moreno, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Michael A Josephson |
| Represented By: | Andrew Wells Dunlap |
| Represented By: | William Richard Liles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sesco Cement, Corp | |
| Represented By: | Daniel F. Patton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
