Rytting v. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| Michael Rytting and Michael Rytting, MD |
| University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center |
| 4:2020cv03996 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff's lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 3/31/21 (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Parties by Michael Rytting, MD, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Plaintiff's Order on Dismissal)(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER Granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 4/1/2021..(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 4/22/2021 at 10:30 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal, filed. (leddins, 4) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed PROPOSED ORDER Granting Enlargement of Time re: #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Michael Rytting, MD, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/6/2021. (Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 11 Agreed PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Scheduling and Docket Control Order, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 10 Agreed JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Michael Rytting, MD, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Michael Rytting, MD, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, filed.(Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ShadiaNash, 4) |
| Filing 5 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Michael Rytting, MD, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 3/26/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(DawnWaggoneradi, 4)
|
| Summons Not Issued as to University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center due to these deficiencies: Bad image. Unable to edit and save the Summons with the information to stay. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25554955) filed by Michael Rytting. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
