Sisson v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| Celena Sisson |
| GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO |
| 4:2020cv04093 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to attorney Landon Keating as to Celena Sisson re: #4 Order for Initial Conference - FORM, filed. (agould, 3) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/5/2021 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, filed.(Osborn, W) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Defendant's List Counsel Parties by GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, filed. (Osborn, W) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County, case number 20-06-06810 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25599143) filed by GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Osborn, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
