Houston Motor & Control, Inc. v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
| Houston Motor & Control, Inc. |
| Ground Package System, Inc., FEDEX CORPORATION, Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Freight, Inc. and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv04197 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Gray H Miller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 11707 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Houston Motor & Control, Inc., filed.(Johnson, Marc) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to FedEx Freight, Inc. served on 12/21/2020, answer due 2/19/2021, filed.(Johnson, Marc) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 3/5/2021 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
|
| REFUND sent to Marc Johnson. REFUND: $402. CHECK # 0541-25640937. (ltien, 4) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25640937) filed by Houston Motor & Control, Inc..(Johnson, Marc) |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25640869) filed by Houston Motor & Control, Inc..(Johnson, Marc) Modified on 12/10/2020 (ltien, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
