Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Plaintiff: Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2020cv04336
Filed: December 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 RECEIPT of Transfer received via email notification re: transfer of case to District of Columbia. New Case # assigned: 1:21-cv-00355 and received on 02/09/2021., filed. (BrendaLacy, 4)
February 9, 2021 Interdistrict transfer to District of Columbia. Case transferred electronically. (lgouadi, 4)
February 8, 2021 Filing 26 JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14) transferring case to District of Columbia to be included in MDL Docket No. 2925. (lgouadi, 4)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #20 Motion for Matthew M. Collette to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 25, 2021 Filing 24 NOTICE of Tag-Along Action, filed. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions)(rcastro, 4)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint shall be extended until two days after this case is docketed in the District of Columbia. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 19, 2021 Filing 22 STIPULATION re: Request to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rothman, Marcy)
January 14, 2021 Filing 21 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Union Pacific Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed.(Rothman, Marcy)
January 14, 2021 Filing 20 MOTION for Matthew M. Collette to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/4/2021. (Rothman, Marcy)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #16 Motion for William L. Roberts to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Jonathan W. Dettmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Craig S. Coleman to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 13, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION for William L. Roberts to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/3/2021. (Kent, David)
January 13, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION for Jonathan W. Dettmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/3/2021. (Kent, David)
January 13, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Craig S. Coleman to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/3/2021. (Kent, David)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion for George T. Caplan to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Kristopher S. Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
January 11, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for Kristopher S. Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/1/2021. (Kent, David)
January 11, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for George T. Caplan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/1/2021. (Kent, David)
January 7, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021, filed.(Kent, David)
January 5, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to CSX Transportation, Inc. served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021, filed.(Kent, David)
January 5, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to BNSF Railway Company served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021, filed.(Kent, David)
January 5, 2021 Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021, filed.(Kent, David)
December 31, 2020 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC, filed.(Kent, David)
December 29, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/3/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ChristopherSarratadi, 4)
December 28, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Kent, David)
December 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25712436) filed by Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kent, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Marcy Lynn Rothman
Represented By: Matthew M Collette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC
Represented By: David C Kent
Represented By: Craig S Coleman
Represented By: Jonathan W Dettmann
Represented By: Kristopher S Davis
Represented By: William L Roberts
Represented By: George T Caplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?