Ineos USA LLC et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC
INEOS USA LLC and INEOS OLIGOMERS USA LLC |
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC |
4:2020cv04378 |
December 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Kenneth M Hoyt |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES: Lead Case No. 4:19-cv-1460 and Member Case No. 4:20-cv-4378 (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Motion to Consolidate by Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Motion to Consolidate, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Consolidation Order)(Harrell, J) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, filed.(Harrell, J) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ineos Oligomers USA LLC, Ineos USA LLC, filed.(Brem, Michael) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 3/5/2021 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(ChristopherSarratadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25737070) filed by INEOS USA LLC, INEOS OLIGOMERS USA LLC.(Brem, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.