Webb v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Everett Dale Webb
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 4:2021cv00030
Filed: January 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #2 Motion to Hold in Abeyance. The Court GRANTS Webbs motion to hold these proceedings in abeyance (Dkt. [2)]. This case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until Webbs state habeas proceedings are completed. Within 30 days after Webb receives notice of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals final decision in his state habeas proceedings, Webb must inform this Court in writing of his intention to proceed with this federal habeas action. If Webb fails to act with due diligence, his motion to reinstate may be denied.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Letter from Everett Dale Webb re: Copy of 11.07 form received from the 85th District Court Brazos County and correction to page 10 of the 2254., filed. (JacquelineMata, 4)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION against Bobby Lumpkin filed by Everett Dale Webb. Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Everett Dale Webb. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(mmapps, 4)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Confirmation of receipt of payment from EVERETTE DALE WEBB in the amount of $ 5.00 Receipt date: 01/27/2021. Receipt number HOU100131. Purpose Description: HABEAS. (ShannonSheriff, 4)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Everett Dale Webb, filed. (ShadiaNash, 4)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Everett Dale Webb, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/11/2021. (ShadiaNash, 4)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Everett Dale Webb. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 2/8/2021, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ChristopherSarrat, 4)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Hold in Abeyance by Everett Dale Webb, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/25/2021. (ChristopherSarrat, 4)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Everett Dale Webb.(ChristopherSarrat, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Webb v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Everett Dale Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?