Genesis Marine, LLC v. SGR Energy, Inc.
Genesis Marine, LLC |
SGR Energy, Inc. |
4:2021cv00289 |
January 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Genesis Marine, LLC, filed.(Kraatz, Arthur) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by SGR Energy, Inc., filed.(McFarland, D) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by SGR Energy, Inc., filed.(McFarland, D) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant SGR Energy, Inc. shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 03/15/2021.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by SGR Energy, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 3/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McFarland, D) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Genesis Marine, LLC, filed.(McLeod, Evans) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 06/10/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 05/11/2021. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 12/07/2021. Deft Expert Report due by 01/06/2022. Discovery due by 03/23/2022. Mediation due by 05/10/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 03/25/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 03/25/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 06/09/2022. Docket Call set for 07/18/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jengonzalezadi) (Entered: 02/11/2021) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to SGR Energy, Inc. served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021, filed.(McLeod, Evans) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/8/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8B before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SGR Energy, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ShadiaNash, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to SGR Energy, Inc., filed.(McLeod, Evans) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SGR Energy, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25881946) filed by Genesis Marine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McLeod, Evans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Genesis Marine, LLC v. SGR Energy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SGR Energy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | D Mitchell McFarland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Genesis Marine, LLC | |
Represented By: | Evans Martin McLeod |
Represented By: | Justin Cole Warner |
Represented By: | Arthur Raymond Kraatz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.