Abbas v. Khanji & Sons, Inc. et al
| Ali Abbas |
| Baboo Khanji and Khanji & Sons, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00320 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/11/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Alias Summons Issued as to Baboo Khanji, Khanji & Sons, Inc., filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 5 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Baboo Khanji, Khanji & Sons, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 4 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Baboo Khanji, Khanji & Sons, Inc. filed by Ali Abbas. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Ali Abbas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Notice of Consent - Ali Abbas)(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ali Abbas, filed.(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Join a Collective/Class Action by Ali Abbas, filed.(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baboo Khanji, Khanji & Sons, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25896813) filed by Ali Abbas.(Ahmed, Salar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
